1sealsemantic last-mile verification

Research / Finding

Ambiguous multi-at-sign mailbox evades excluded email name constraints

F-BC-NC-MULTIAT-001

Public snapshot: 26 Sep 2026. Status, releases and attribution belong to each source below; none is inferred from another record.

Read the evidence · View in research browse

Recorded evidence

—score not recorded
bcgit/bc-javaReported fixbcgit/bc-java

Ambiguous multi-at-sign mailbox evades excluded email name constraints

Fixed in: Java 1.85 and C# 2.7.0, with default strict email-name parsing

fixed publicly
details
Finding IDs
F-BC-NC-MULTIAT-001
Status
fixed publicly
Fixed in
Java 1.85 and C# 2.7.0, with default strict email-name parsing
Note
A certificate email name with an at-sign inside a quoted local part could be split at the first at-sign, causing an excluded-domain check to miss the actual mailbox domain. Java commit a535c770 on 2 July 2026 and C# commit 9c2f6510 on 6 July reject ambiguous multiple-at-sign tested names when email constraints apply; regression tests include the reported quoted-local-part form. Both Java 1.85 and C# 2.7.0 contain the check. The optional lenient-rfc822-name compatibility setting restores the old parsing, so the fixed-version statement assumes the default strict configuration. This is separate from trailing-dot DNS normalization; no CVE is inferred from adjacent name-constraint fixes. Public-source review does not establish vendor attribution, an assigned severity or a fresh end-to-end retest.

F-BC-NC-MULTIAT-001: Verification failures. Splitting a quoted mailbox at the first at-sign compares the wrong domain against certificate name constraints. Reviewed 26 Sep 2026. Mechanism assessed by 1seal.

Mechanism source for F-BC-NC-MULTIAT-001

Security area (1seal assessment): Identity. Splitting a quoted mailbox at the first at-sign compares the wrong domain against certificate name constraints. Reviewed 26 Sep 2026.

Clarify or correct this record privately. The email subject includes the finding ID. For an existing case, continue the agreed private thread. Do not post unpublished vulnerability details in public issues. Research disclosure policy.

How this page groups evidence

This identifier groups recorded evidence; it is not an additional CVE, independent-vulnerability count or guarantee of vendor confirmation. Fixed code, released versions, attribution and independent discovery are distinct claims. Absent metadata means not recorded, not disproved. Counting rules.